简体中文
The Japanese cabinet on Tuesday rubber-stamped a resolution that will allow the country to exercise the right to collective self-defense by reinterpreting the pacifist Constitution, despite strong criticism from home and abroad.
The resolution, which is regarded as a major overhaul of Japan' s postwar security policy, sets three new conditions that would enable the exercise the right to collective self-defense including when there are "clear dangers" to the lives of its people and their rights due to armed attacks on Japan or "countries with close ties."
It, in substance, will enable Japan to take military action to defend other countries even though the nation itself is not under attack, marking a major overhaul from Japan's exclusively defense- oriented policy in the postwar era.
According to the cabinet decision, Japan would also speed up the dispatch of its Self-Defense Force to "gray zone" low intensity situations that stop short of military attacks, and examine extending logistical and other support in peacekeeping missions overseas.
After the cabinet approval, the government is expected to prepare the legal framework by revising and creating relevant laws to implement the policy change, said Japan's Kyodo News Agency.
The move has been strongly opposed by Japanese people. Polls conducted by major Japanese newspapers showed that more than half of Japanese opposed Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's attempt to lift the self imposed ban on collective self-defense.
According to a survey conducted through June 27 to 29 by Japan' s Nikkei News, 54 percent of respondents say no to reinterpretation of Japan's anti-war constitution, only 29 percent of the respondents support the move.
Another poll by Mainichi Shimbun showed that 58 percent of respondents were against the way Abe used to give green light to collective self-defense, while 38 percent voted for his efforts.
Just two days before the cabinet decision, a man set himself on fire in a busy Tokyo street to protest against Abe and his attempt to broaden Japan's military capabilities.
More and more people took to the streets to express their strong opposition. On Monday evening, an estimated 10,000 people gathered in front of Abe's official residence. They held banners which read "Tokyo against Fascism," "Absolutely oppose cabinet resolution," and "Step down, Abe," condemning the government's risky move which would drag Japan into war.
South Korea and China, two nations that suffered under Japanese wartime aggression, also expressed concerns after Japan's cabinet decision. South Korean Foreign Ministry said in a statement: "When it comes to Japan's security discussion, the Japanese government should dispel doubts and concerns stemming from history, abandon historical revisionism and behave properly in a bid to win confidence from its neighboring countries."
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said at a daily routine news briefing "Japan must respect its neighbors' security concerns, not harm the national sovereignty and security interests of China and not undermine regional peace and stability."
For historical reasons, Japanese policy moves in military and security fields are closely watched by its Asian neighbors and the international community, Hong said.
