Huawei is not the scapegoat to hurt 'special U.S.-UK relationship'

Sun Chenghao

text

U.S. President Donald Trump (R) shakes hands with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson (L) as they take part in a session on reforming the United Nations at U.N. Headquarters in New York, U.S., September 18, 2017. /Reuters

**Editor's note: **Sun Chenghao is an assistant research professor at the Institute of American Studies, China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations. The article reflects the author's opinions, not necessarily the views of CGTN.

Regardless of the U.S. piled pressure, the British government announcedthat it will allow China's Huawei to help build the country's next generation of a super-fast wireless networks, although that will be restricted from "sensitive functions".

The U.S. has spent months lobbying the UK, one of its closest allies, to ban Huawei from building the country's 5G network. The U.S. believed that Huawei has ties with the Chinese government and might pose a national securitythreat to the U.S. and its allies. As an ally sharing a so-called "special relationship" with the U.S., Britain's decision struck a blow for the U.S.'s global efforts to isolate Huawei.

Not surprisingly, the U.S.'s reaction is full of disappointment and anger. Several U.S. media pointed out that the U.S.-UK special relationship is under a test due to Britain's Huawei decision.

The U.S. Secretaryof State Mike Pompeo, before meeting UK's foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, urged the country to reverse the Huawei decision. Some Republican officials even warned that the decisioncould lead the U.S. Congress to block a post-Brexit trade deal.

Ifthe U.S.-UK special relationshipis deteriorating, Huawei is not the scapegoat. The UK has already taken much time to ponder the pros and cons for allowing Huawei to help build its 5G network. It is the fact that except Huawei there is no better choice to provide UK's consumers with faster broadband. No matter how special the relationship is, the U.S. should respect UK's independent policymaking and not directly interfere in UK's decision on Huawei otherwise it will make the relationship more challenging.

A consumer tests network speed with a Huawei 5G mobile phone at Huawei 5G Innovation and Experience Center in London, Britain, January. 28, 2020. /Xinhua Photo

Even without the controversy over Huawei, the U.S.-UK are not speaking in one voice on China. The fundamental cause of the rift is their different perceptions and attitudes towards the world order and China's rise.

The U.S.has deep doubts and anxieties about the rise of the emerging powers represented by Chinawhile the UKis keenly aware of the opportunities brought about by the changing global power structure.

The UK, especially after its decision to leave the European Union, holdsa more accommodating viewtowards cooperation with China. In addition to being the first to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the UK's attitude towards the internationalization of the yuanis also far different from that of the U.S. Besides, the UK has become the world's biggest center for trading yuan outside China.

A pedestrian walks past a Huawei store in Sydney, Australia, May 23, 2019. /Xinhua Photo

In essence, the U.S.-UK relationship is less special than before. From the perspective of Britain, Brexit will greatly reduce the U.S.dependence on Britain. Besidesthe strength of the UKitself, the U.S.values its specialties with the UKdue to its role in the European Union. Both, the U.S.and the UK, belong to the English-speaking world, and the UKis often regarded as a bridge between the U.S.and Europe.

For instance, on the issue of security, the UK often supportsU.S.policies in the EU and takes care of the U.S.interest within the EU to a certain extent. Once UKleaves EU, the U.S.will have to find anothercountry in the EUthat can play the role as its strategic footing.

Even worseis the adjustment of the U.S.'s foreign policiesafter Trump took office. Guidedby the "America First" policy, the Trump administration is indifferent to facilitate the special relationship with the UK, but more concerned about how to tap the potential of allies to achievethe goal of"Make America Great Again".

The UKhopes that thespecialrelationship between the two countries should bebased on the post-war international order, common values ​​and interest. However, the two countriesobviously disagree with each other on issues such as climate change, the Iran nuclear dealand NATO, which will further undermine the special relationship in the future.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at [email protected].)